Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add basic vim editor configuration for SAW #1329

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021
Merged

add basic vim editor configuration for SAW #1329

merged 12 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

nano-o
Copy link
Contributor

@nano-o nano-o commented Jun 10, 2021

Adds a vim plugin with basic syntax highlighting and vim-slime configuration to send saw snippets to a running saw interpreter. Improvements welcome!

@nano-o nano-o marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2021 03:39
@nano-o nano-o changed the title Vim add basic vim editor configuration for SAW Jul 12, 2021
robdockins
robdockins approved these changes Jul 14, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@robdockins robdockins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know anything about vim, but this seems unlikely to break anything.

@nano-o nano-o added the PR: ready to merge Magic flag for pull requests to ask Mergify to merge given an approval and a successful CI run label Jul 15, 2021
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 454fd1c into GaloisInc:master Jul 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@robdockins robdockins robdockins approved these changes

@andreistefanescu andreistefanescu Awaiting requested review from andreistefanescu

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
PR: ready to merge Magic flag for pull requests to ask Mergify to merge given an approval and a successful CI run
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nano-o @robdockins