Coq section #1468
Merged
Coq section #1468
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
and translate `primitive` declarations into section `Variable` declarations instead of using top-level parameters.
included in the eventual printed term. This avoids more instances where terms become "let" bound that appear not to be referenced in the printed term.
|
This seems like an interesting direction to go with the Coq translation. I'd love to talk more about it at some point. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alter Coq export for Cryptol modules so that all declarations are wrapped in a
Section, and cause primitive declarations to be translated as section variables instead of top-level parameters.Also, improve some of the pretty-printing accounting to skip let-binding of terms that are elided.