Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1691 by bringing in GaloisInc/crucible#1004 #1695

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2022
Merged

Fix #1691 by bringing in GaloisInc/crucible#1004 #1695

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2022

Conversation

RyanGlScott
Copy link
Contributor

Now that the crucible-llvm memory model has a fix for GaloisInc/crucible#1004, bumping the crucible submodule to bring in that change fixes #1691 as a consequence. I have also added a regression test.

robdockins and others added 2 commits June 24, 2022 08:04
Now that the `crucible-llvm` memory model has a fix for
GaloisInc/crucible#1004, bumping the `crucible` submodule to bring in that
change fixes #1691 as a consequence. I have also added a regression test.
@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott added subsystem: crucible-llvm Issues related to LLVM bitcode verification with crucible-llvm topics: bitfields Issues related to SAW's support for bitfields labels Jun 24, 2022
@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott requested a review from chameco June 24, 2022 12:35
@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott added the PR: ready to merge Magic flag for pull requests to ask Mergify to merge given an approval and a successful CI run label Jun 24, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 4666760 into master Jun 24, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the T1691 branch June 24, 2022 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: ready to merge Magic flag for pull requests to ask Mergify to merge given an approval and a successful CI run subsystem: crucible-llvm Issues related to LLVM bitcode verification with crucible-llvm topics: bitfields Issues related to SAW's support for bitfields
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bitfield-related proof works with llvm_alloc, but not llvm_alloc_readonly
3 participants