-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor info to allow datetime inputs from xarray.Dataset and pandas.DataFrame tables #619
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
943324b
Refactor info to use virtualfile_from_vectors to support datetime inputs
weiji14 91ee02d
Test that xarray.Dataset inputs into pygmt.info works too
weiji14 a394a86
Merge branch 'master' into info_on_datetime
weiji14 744a6cb
Expect failures on test_info_*_time_column on GMT 6.1.1
weiji14 dbbc2ab
Document xarray.Datasets with 1D data_vars as allowed inputs to info
weiji14 277f197
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into info_on_datetime
weiji14 e7ecd9a
Fix a typo
weiji14 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this test currently fails, giving what looks like a UNIX timestamp rather than an ISO datetime output:
Will need to investigate, but any idea why this is happening? Or is this expected behaviour?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
GMT_Put_Vector started to accept datetime strings in PR GenericMappingTools/gmt#3396. In this implementation, all datetime strings are converted to
double
internally.Looks like a GMT API bug to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the inputs are read correctly here, we can pass in datetime types using the
GMT_DATETIME
enum. The output is also the correct UNIX timestamp range, but I doubt it's something users would expect.I suppose we can
xfail
this for 6.1.1, but would prefer to have this reported and/or fixed in GMT master first (i.e. for 6.2.0) Edit: issue opened at GenericMappingTools/gmt#4241. A workaround might be to usenp.datetime64(1577836800, 's')
to getnumpy.datetime64('2020-01-01T00:00:00')
, but this isn't a nice solution.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes to me.