-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a table for compatibility of PyGMT with Python and GMT #763
Conversation
|
||
======= ========== ========= | ||
PyGMT GMT Python | ||
======= ========== ========= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can add the 0.3.0 entry now or later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's add it later, not too sure yet when we want to cut a 0.3.0 release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can release v0.3.0 two weeks before GMT v6.2.0 (late Jan or early Feb).
README.rst
Outdated
======= ========== ========= | ||
PyGMT GMT Python | ||
======= ========== ========= | ||
0.2.1 >=6.1.1 3.6 - 3.9 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we went no-arch in v0.2.1 (see #690), should the Python compatibility be >=3.6
? Not sure how to test on Python 3.10 but it should technically work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do Python 3.6 codes always work with future Python versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should? I think async/await became reserved names in 3.7 but PyGMT doesn't use those, or any advanced stuff really. Things should be safe until Python 4 at least.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, changed to ">=3.6".
Description of proposed changes
Fixes #748.
Reminders
make format
andmake check
to make sure the code follows the style guide.doc/api/index.rst
.Notes
/format
in the first line of a comment to lint the code automatically