[PBE-5891] Remove NotInFilterObject
#5394
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JcMinarro
changed the title
NotInFilterObjectNotInFilterObject
|
Why do we need to wait for the backend to remove this? I think it will stay there for backward compatibility. Is it an issue if we remove it client side? I think this is the desired behavior. |
|
@aleksandar-apostolov We are not waiting to the backend implementation but our deprecation process. |
JcMinarro
force-pushed
the
feature/remove-not-in-filter
branch
from
133e05a to
04a40f8
Compare
JcMinarro
changed the title
NotInFilterObjectNotInFilterObject
aleksandar-apostolov
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎯 Goal
Depend on #5393
This PR removes the
NotInFilterObjectclass that is not supported backend-side anymore.We needs to wait one release before it can be merged
🎉 GIF