Skip to content

Conversation

@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor

Builds on #390, switches to configuration based approach rather than hard coding branch name

@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2015
@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @GeertvanHorrik for the initial PR.

@andreasohlund this PR now contains a breaking change between beta.1 and stable. The branch configurations now use the - naming like the overall configuration rather than camel casing.

@andreasohlund
Copy link
Contributor

Got it, looks good to me!

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Jake Ginnivan notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks @GeertvanHorrik https://github.com/GeertvanHorrik for the
initial PR.

@andreasohlund https://github.com/andreasohlund this PR now contains a
breaking change between beta.1 and stable. The branch configurations now
use the - naming like the overall configuration rather than camel casing.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#392 (comment)
.

JakeGinnivan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2015
@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan merged commit e4dcf71 into GitTools:master Mar 16, 2015
@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan deleted the pr/GitFlowWithDevelop branch March 16, 2015 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants