Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not return the tag as branch name for GitLab CI #4187

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AlphaYankee
Copy link

In case of a tag pipeline, return null as branch name instead of the tag

Description

For tag pipelines (triggered by tagging a commit), do not return CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME as the current branch because in this case it contains the new tag instead of a branch.

Related Issue

Fixes #4186

Motivation and Context

Bugfix

How Has This Been Tested?

Manually tested the following scenarios on GitLab CI:

  • Commit
  • Tag
  • Branches
  • Merge requests

Also ran the tests in the solution.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

In case of a tag pipeline, return null as branch name instead of the tag
@HHobeck
Copy link
Contributor

HHobeck commented Aug 30, 2024

Hi there.

What happens:

  • when you trigger a tag (pre-release version) from lets say development branch?
  • when the tag is on main and merged to development?

Would be good to have some integration tests to cover your scenario.

@arturcic arturcic force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from f07f4e0 to c2946bc Compare August 30, 2024 11:24
@AlphaYankee
Copy link
Author

I think this should cover the Scenarios (label for main branches is "dev")...

Unfortunately at the moment I don't think I'll have the time to find out how to create those automated tests and implement them.

Tag branch master with v1.2.0

"FullSemVer": "1.2.0"
"InformationalVersion": "1.2.0+Branch.master.Sha.f638f0ff709f763982676abd6698a678889302a1"
(in 6.0.2 this would result in FullSemVer=1.2.1-v1-2-0.1+0)

Create branch development from master

"FullSemVer": "1.2.1-development.1+0"
"InformationalVersion": "1.2.1-development.1+0.Branch.development.Sha.f638f0ff709f763982676abd6698a678889302a1"
(same as in 6.0.2)

Commit on development

"FullSemVer": "1.2.1-development.1+1"
"InformationalVersion": "1.2.1-development.1+1.Branch.development.Sha.c04e043529d8e0809d55e3b1d8b5ea70f4fb7b9a"
(same as in 6.0.2)

Tag branch development with v1.3.0

"FullSemVer": "1.3.1-development.1+0"
"InformationalVersion": "1.3.1-development.1+0.Branch.development.Sha.c04e043529d8e0809d55e3b1d8b5ea70f4fb7b9a"
(in 6.0.2 this would result in FullSemVer=1.3.1-v1-3-0.1+0)

Merge branch development into master

FullSemVer": "1.3.1-dev.1"
"InformationalVersion": "1.3.1-dev.1+Branch.master.Sha.ddfcf3381ca1dba1b4ad77f407d4ee1d560e8fc1"
(same as in 6.0.2)

Commit on master

"FullSemVer": "1.3.1-dev.2"
"InformationalVersion": "1.3.1-dev.2+Branch.master.Sha.c2e373ff0ff90010a835d158b53a9f9d524d4355"
(same as in 6.0.2)

Tag branch master with v1.3.1

"FullSemVer": "1.3.1"
"InformationalVersion": "1.3.1+Branch.master.Sha.c2e373ff0ff90010a835d158b53a9f9d524d4355"
(in 6.0.2 this would result in FullSemVer=1.3.2-v1-3-1.1+0)

Merge branch master into development

"FullSemVer": "1.3.2-development.1+1"
"InformationalVersion": "1.3.2-development.1+1.Branch.development.Sha.69092abd47e89cc20688853b0f0fa5523d6e58fa"
(same as in 6.0.2)

@ITaluone
Copy link
Contributor

ITaluone commented Nov 8, 2024

Is there a plan for merge this fix?

@arturcic
Copy link
Member

arturcic commented Nov 8, 2024

@HHobeck do you think we should get this merged?

@HHobeck
Copy link
Contributor

HHobeck commented Nov 9, 2024

Yes, I think it can be merged.

@asbjornu
Copy link
Member

asbjornu commented Nov 9, 2024

I think it needs tests. I also think we should investigate whether we can implement the same solution for other CI environments as well.

@arturcic arturcic requested a review from Copilot November 19, 2024 20:14

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ISSUE]: GitLab CI tag pipelines result in an incorrect version
5 participants