Skip to content

LaTeX support #151

Closed
Closed
@maxheld83

Description

@maxheld83

As I mentioned in #134 I (and I think a lot of other scholars) have been waiting for something like gitbook to come along for a very long time.
This might just be one of the missing pieces to the puzzle of online scientific publishing.
PDFs, no matter how well structured and meta-data-ed always felt a little awkard online, with people having to download them and all.

Still, academic publishing as over decades (nay, centuries) developed many helpful conventions (theorem numbering, glossaries, acronyms, – you name it) that don't sit easily with markdown.

Fortunately, we have one markup language that has implemented all of these things already: LaTeX.
Of course, much of the typesetting genius (and baggage) of TeX becomes redundant once you publish to a static website.
But still, the conventions have all been implemented, and people know who to write in this markup (not to mention legacy projects).

So here's my (long-winded) question: any chance gitbook might evolve to be a front-end to LaTeX, too? Maybe via Pandoc?

Am I making sense?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions