This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Throw an exception when calling
MembershipManager::getGroupIds()
with an entity which is not group content #311Throw an exception when calling
MembershipManager::getGroupIds()
with an entity which is not group content #311Changes from all commits
a8f7ca8
55ffd91
ca33d8b
36148e8
e4e6b65
978bbe6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already know at this point whether the entity is group content, so a small reshuffle of these two lines into the if statement is sufficient to not do an unneeded call to
MembershipManager::getGroups()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or we could test for Drupal\user\UserInterface?
Also use === of you want strict typing
Also might have been useful to have this check within getGroups().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with this proposal but these lines of code are not in fact being changed here, this PR just introduces this single line and moves the related code in it:
I will create a separate PR to implement this suggestion, so this can stay on scope.