Update scripts/index and gothic sourcer article

[muczc1wek]

No description provided.

[kamilkrzyskow]

The language server is AFAIK tool agnostic, it's not bound to VS Code, but the extension using the language server is.
I also think if there are alternative tools to some aspects of Gothic Sourcer, then the article should have an opinionated comment about this, but I don't know about alternative 😆

[muczc1wek]

The language server is AFAIK tool agnostic, it's not bound to VS Code, but the extension using the language server is.

So how should I put this? I know dls != vscode-daedalus, but for the regular user these things are the same

[kamilkrzyskow]

Perhaps they're seen as the same, but docs should strive for factuality. Of course there are some opinionated takes here or there, but there should be a good reason for those.

Here instead of "Also known as Daedalus Language Server", for example change it to "The VS Code extension acts as a proxy for the Daedalus Language Server to provide [list of features]" or "The VS Code extension provides [list of features] and uses Daedalus Language Server as the back-end for them." etc. maybe ChatGPT has something better.

[kamilkrzyskow]

LGTM, nice work on the preservation of the Gothic Sourcer in a separate repository 👍
You can squash merge when you want ✌️