-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Impact value #233
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Impact value #233
Conversation
impact_value_transfered: | ||
type: integer | ||
description: 'The number of impact valued that has been actually transfered, this field is just valid when the transfer request type is setting impact value as the parameter' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ZavenArra For the impact value transfer, I added the field called impact_value_transfered
in the response, to indicate the actual impact value has been transferred in the transfer operation.
Also, I will return this field in the accept
and fulfill
endpoint if needed.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And @ZavenArra another question, should we need to set the value_matrix_id parameter for the impact value transfer?
add impact value, test
add token.value field test can accept transfer requesting imapce value
can accept the pending transfer
…n-trading-api into impact-value
New commit resolve #242 |
No description provided.