Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: json conversion #4893

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

refactor: json conversion #4893

merged 13 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

CookiePieWw
Copy link
Collaborator

@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw commented Oct 29, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#4230

What's changed and what's your intention?

Some context:
Currently the auto conversions of json type of pgsql are performed on servers:

ScalarValue::Binary(data.map(|d| jsonb::Value::from(d).to_vec()))

It works for pgsql, but when using PREPARE and EXECUTE through mysql client (both cli and protocol), we cannot identify the json column like pgsql server did to perform the conversion.

This patch moves the conversion to the cast between binary and json column, which works for all clients.

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Oct 29, 2024
@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2024 04:24
@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2024 04:24
src/common/recordbatch/src/recordbatch.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/datatypes/src/vectors/binary.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.96970% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.98%. Comparing base (0ee455a) to head (140edc0).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4893      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.17%   83.98%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files        1136     1137       +1     
  Lines      208600   209204     +604     
==========================================
+ Hits       175593   175691      +98     
- Misses      33007    33513     +506     

Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/datatypes/src/error.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@WenyXu WenyXu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM

Co-authored-by: Weny Xu <wenymedia@gmail.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@fengjiachun fengjiachun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@WenyXu WenyXu added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2024
@WenyXu WenyXu removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Oct 29, 2024
@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2024 12:08
@CookiePieWw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jsonb has something wrong when processing corrupted jsonb data (like a valid jsonb without its last few chars), which may corrupt the whole system. I'll come to it later for further fixes.
image

@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2024 12:15
@WenyXu
Copy link
Member

WenyXu commented Oct 29, 2024

jsonb has something wrong when processing corrupted jsonb data (like a valid jsonb without its last few chars), which may corrupt the whole system. I'll come to it later for further fixes. image

We can open an issue for this

@WenyXu WenyXu enabled auto-merge October 29, 2024 15:43
@WenyXu WenyXu added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit 8ed5bc5 Oct 29, 2024
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants