Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: do not remove time filters in ScanRegion #5180

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

evenyag
Copy link
Contributor

@evenyag evenyag commented Dec 16, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

What's changed and what's your intention?

Don't remove time filters when building time ranges in ScanRegion. Then the parquet reader can use the time filters to prune row groups. This PR also removes the time range from the parquet reader.

Now the scanner only uses the time range to find files to scan.

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Dec 16, 2024
@evenyag evenyag force-pushed the feat/time-range-prune-rowgroups branch from 2541ff1 to e20130e Compare December 17, 2024 06:29
@evenyag evenyag added A-storage Involves code in storage engines backport This patch is to be backported to current release branch labels Dec 17, 2024
@evenyag evenyag mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024
9 tasks
@evenyag evenyag changed the title feat: do not remove time filters feat: do not remove time filters in ScanRegion Dec 17, 2024
@evenyag evenyag added the C-performance Category Performance label Dec 17, 2024
@evenyag evenyag marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 10:49
@evenyag evenyag requested review from v0y4g3r, waynexia and a team as code owners December 17, 2024 10:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.80%. Comparing base (bfc777e) to head (e20130e).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5180      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.04%   83.80%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files        1173     1175       +2     
  Lines      218819   218904      +85     
==========================================
- Hits       183904   183452     -452     
- Misses      34915    35452     +537     

Copy link
Contributor

@killme2008 killme2008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit c6b7caa Dec 18, 2024
73 checks passed
@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r deleted the feat/time-range-prune-rowgroups branch December 18, 2024 06:56
evenyag added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
* feat: do not remove time filters

* chore: remove `time_range` from parquet reader

* chore: print more message in the check script

* chore: fix unused error
@evenyag evenyag removed the backport This patch is to be backported to current release branch label Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-storage Involves code in storage engines C-performance Category Performance docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants