Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade 0.17 alpha v2 #3

Merged
merged 1,050 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023
Merged

Upgrade 0.17 alpha v2 #3

merged 1,050 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

HashEngineering
Copy link

No description provided.

schildbach and others added 30 commits April 1, 2023 21:17
… message

It's up to the caller to not mix networks.
…ther than address

Addresses are expensive to create, as we need to know a network they are created for.
…attern

Instantiating these classes is cheap, as they're stateless. And we
only do that once per `Wallet` instance.
…rather than addresses

Addresses are expensive to create, as we need to know a network they are created for.
The helpers from `TimeUtils` are affected by the mock clock, which
is not desired for debug output.
This is so that the special handling for regtest network can work in future.
…ubleSpendTxns()`

Addresses are expensive to create, as we need to know a network they are created for.
Addresses are expensive to create, as we need to know a network they are created for.
Also remove redundant check for `getConfidenceType() == BUILDING` and improve
the JavaDoc.
…tests

These tests use `MainNetParams` and `SigNetParams`, but not `UnitTestParams`.
The max target aspect is tested by the `difficultyTransitions*()` tests
already.
…n.PONG`

Our minimum version is at 70000 already.
It doesn't make much sense in a getter. It should be checked when
adding a block to the chain, like all the other checks.
…()` and `hasLimitedBlockChain()`

Our API is now fluent enough that we don't need them any more.
@HashEngineering HashEngineering self-assigned this Aug 15, 2023
@HashEngineering HashEngineering merged commit e4e810b into master Aug 23, 2023
54 checks passed
@HashEngineering HashEngineering deleted the upgrade-0.17-alpha-v2 branch August 18, 2024 05:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants