Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

U+06AF Gaf(گ) line placement issues #18

Open
eliheuer opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

U+06AF Gaf(گ) line placement issues #18

eliheuer opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@eliheuer
Copy link
Contributor

eliheuer commented Sep 11, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Example [ كتاب & گتاب ]:
gaf

The Gaf (U+06AF) line seems to be misplaced and causes large gaps between connecting letters.
@eliheuer eliheuer changed the title U+06AF Gaf line placement issues U+06AF Gaf(ࢰ) line placement issues Sep 11, 2019
@eliheuer eliheuer changed the title U+06AF Gaf(ࢰ) line placement issues U+06AF Gaf(گ) line placement issues Sep 11, 2019
@eliheuer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm working on a fix for this and will make a pull request soon.
Screen Shot 2019-09-11 at 4 41 22 PM

@eliheuer
Copy link
Contributor Author

eliheuer commented Sep 12, 2019 •
edited
Loading

I made the updates in my fork and tested them, PR incoming:
lem

eliheuer added a commit to eliheuer/Lemonada that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2019
@eliheuer
Add fixes for U+06AF Gaf(گ) line placement issues (Gue3bara#18)
49cae9a
eliheuer added a commit to eliheuer/Lemonada that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2019
@eliheuer
Fix Gaf bar, issue Gue3bara#18
983abc7
@eliheuer eliheuer mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2019
Merged
Gue3bara added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2020
@Gue3bara
Merge pull request #19 from eliheuer/gaf-fix
d3d6064 
Fix Gaf bar, issue #18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@eliheuer