Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #3

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jul 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the secrets scanning workflow with permissions for secrets-scan job.
    • Updated and renamed several steps to improve the clarity and functionality, including tool installation and report generation.
    • Added steps to upload artifacts and generate a detailed view of detected secrets.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jul 12, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Jul 12, 2024

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • The Generate report step is missing a name attribute which could help in identifying the step in the workflow logs.
    • In the Generate report step, the condition if: failure() is not correctly formatted. It should be moved to its own line.
    • The artifact upload paths in the Upload artifacts steps are missing a file separator before the file names (e.g., >secrets-result.log should be > secrets-result.log).
    • The action guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.590 is the same for both "Read secrets-result.log" and "Read secrets-result.md" steps. This seems incorrect or might be a typo.
    • In the step Read secrets-result.md, it specifies the path as secrets-result.md but the comments indicate it's reading a CSV file. This misalignment needs to be clarified.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Consider adding more descriptive names for the steps to improve readability and maintainability.
    • Ensure consistent indentation throughout the file for better readability.
    • Add comments to explain complex or non-obvious logic to aid future maintenance.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the GitHub Actions workflow for Infisical secrets scanning include enhancing permissions, renaming steps for clarity, and adding steps to generate and upload reports. These changes aim to improve the process of detecting and reporting secrets in the codebase, making it more efficient and user-friendly.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Added permissions for secrets-scan job.
- Renamed step from installing Infisical to installing tools.
- Added steps to generate a report, upload artifacts, and read Markdown file.
- Updated actions for reading log and report files.
- Modified message format for scan results and detailed view for detected secrets.

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code so fine,
Secrets hidden, now we’ll find.
With tools installed and reports to show,
Transparency will surely grow.
Permissions set, artifacts in line,
Our workflow now is so divine. 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Comment on lines 12 to 20

secrets-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:

- name: Checkout repo

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

Good enhancement to restrict permissions. Consider further tightening them based on minimal requirements.

+      pull-requests: write

Often pull-requests: read suffices. Only use write if absolutely necessary for making comments or changes.

+      pull-requests: read

Comment on lines 94 to 112
```
${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}
```

message-failure: |
**Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!

**Scan results:**
```
${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}
```
**Scan report:**
```
${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}
```

<details>
<summary>🔎 Detected secrets in your GIT history</summary>

${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}

</details>
message-cancelled: |
**Infisical secrets check:** :o: Secrets check cancelled!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. Use consistent indentation for better readability.
  2. Replace code output with fenced code blocks for Markdown rendering.
$${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}
**Scan results:**
$${{ steps.log.outputs.contents }}

```markdown
<details>
  <summary>🔎 Detected secrets in your GIT history</summary>

$${{ steps.report.outputs.contents }}

</details>

Comment on lines 26 to 85
shell: bash
run: curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh' | sudo -E bash

- name: Install Infisical
- name: Install tools
shell: bash
run: |
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical
pip install csvkit
npm install -g csv-to-markdown-table

- name: Run scan
shell: bash
run: infisical scan --redact -f csv -r secrets-result.csv 2>&1 | tee >(sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' > secrets-result.log)
run: infisical scan --redact -f csv -r secrets-result-raw.csv 2>&1 | tee >(sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' >secrets-result.log)

- name: Generate report
shell: bash
if: failure()
run: |
if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then
csvformat -M $'\r' secrets-result-raw.csv | sed -e ':a' -e 'N;$!ba' -e 's/\n/\\n/g' | tr '\r' '\n' | head -n 11 >secrets-result.csv
csv-to-markdown-table --delim , --headers <secrets-result.csv >secrets-result.md
fi

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.log
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: always()
with:
name: report-log
path: secrets-result.log

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.csv
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: report-csv
path: secrets-result.csv

- name: Upload artifacts secrets-result.md
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: report-md
path: secrets-result.md

- name: Read secrets-result.log
uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.583
uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.590
if: always()
id: log
with:
path: secrets-result.log

- name: Read secrets-result.log
uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.583
- name: Read secrets-result.md
uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.590
if: failure()
id: report
with:
path: secrets-result.csv
path: secrets-result.md

- name: Update PR with comment
uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

  1. Combine installations into one apt-get command for efficiency.
  2. Use set -euxo pipefail to improve script reliability.
  3. Utilize environment files for readability.
-          sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical
+          sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical csvkit
+          npm install -g csv-to-markdown-table

+          set -euxo pipefail

Consider using environment files to maintain cleaner scripts and easier debugging.

env:
  REPORT_CSV: secrets-result.csv
  REPORT_MD: secrets-result.md
  REPORT_LOG: secrets-result.log

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

  • ➕ Added permissions to the secrets-scan job for reading contents and writing pull requests.
  • ➕ Installed additional tools (csvkit and csv-to-markdown-table) for processing scan results.
  • ➕ Added steps to generate a markdown report from the scan results.
  • ➕ Added steps to upload artifacts (secrets-result.log, secrets-result.csv, secrets-result.md) conditionally based on the scan outcome.
  • ➕ Updated the action version for guibranco/github-file-reader-action from v2.2.583 to v2.2.590.
  • 📖 Improved the PR comment format to include a collapsible section for the detailed scan report.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 💪Best Practices The csvformat command in the Generate report step is complex and could be simplified. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 1: Complex csvformat Command

Details: The csvformat command in the Generate report step is complex and could be simplified for better maintainability. (File: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml, Lines: 34-36)

Proposed Fix:

- name: Generate report
  shell: bash
  if: failure()
  run: |
    if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then
      csvformat -M $'\r' secrets-result-raw.csv | sed -e ':a' -e 'N;$!ba' -e 's/\n/\\n/g' | tr '\r' '\n' | head -n 11 > secrets-result.csv
      csv-to-markdown-table --delim , --headers < secrets-result.csv > secrets-result.md
    fi

Explanation: The proposed fix simplifies the csvformat command by breaking it down into more manageable parts. This enhances readability and maintainability.

General Review

The proposed changes enhance the functionality of the workflow by adding new features such as generating and uploading detailed scan reports. The code quality is generally good, but the csvformat command in the Generate report step is complex and could be simplified for better maintainability.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
I'd love a reaction or reply with your thoughts.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 12, 2024
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:48AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:48AM INF 6 commits scanned.
1:48AM INF scan completed in 65.9ms
1:48AM INF no leaks found

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad382b and aebb776.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml (6)

15-17: Permissions added are appropriate.

Permissions for contents: read and pull-requests: write are necessary for the job to function correctly, ensuring it can read repository contents and update pull requests.


29-34: Step renaming is appropriate.

The step name has been changed from "installing Infisical" to "installing tools" to accurately reflect the installation of multiple tools.


40-48: Report generation step added appropriately.

The new step processes the CSV file, converts it to Markdown, and generates a report if secrets are detected. This enhances the workflow by providing a detailed report in case of failure.


49-55: Artifact upload steps added appropriately.

The new steps upload artifacts (secrets-result.log, secrets-result.csv, and secrets-result.md), ensuring that the log and report files are available for further analysis.

Also applies to: 56-62, 63-68


71-75: Log and report reading steps added appropriately.

The new steps use the github-file-reader-action to read the contents of the secrets-result.log and secrets-result.md files, making their contents available for use in subsequent steps.

Also applies to: 77-82


100-110: Message format enhancement is appropriate.

The new message format provides a more comprehensive and user-friendly summary of the scan results, including a detailed view of detected secrets if any are found.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) July 12, 2024 01:56
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jul 12, 2024
@guibranco guibranco merged commit 971bb7c into main Jul 12, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch July 12, 2024 01:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant