Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need way to poll sources (from redis) #627

Open
StevenCTimm opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Need way to poll sources (from redis) #627

StevenCTimm opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
prj_testing Issue identified in HEPCloud Project IV integration testing

Comments

@StevenCTimm
Copy link

When everything is now concentrated into one channel and that channel goes offline for some reason, then it is not possible to poll any of the data blocks via the de-client --print-product functionality. In this case it would be nice to be able to poll the data from the running sources in the redis facility, because the sources all keep running.

@StevenCTimm StevenCTimm added the prj_testing Issue identified in HEPCloud Project IV integration testing label Mar 10, 2022
@StevenCTimm
Copy link
Author

Discussion in today's meeting brought up that there is likely a way already in redis-cli to do this, we just have to figure out the right commands. redis-cli can be run via podman exec against the container.

@knoepfel
Copy link
Contributor

@StevenCTimm, we can likely find a way to print the value of enqueued data products. However, now that message-bloat problem with DE 2.0 has been resolved, printing the value of enqueued data products will only be useful when no channel is able to consume the products--e.g., the channel has gone offline for some reason. So...is this facility still desired?

@StevenCTimm
Copy link
Author

StevenCTimm commented Mar 28, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
prj_testing Issue identified in HEPCloud Project IV integration testing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants