Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

$SU(3)$ support #43

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 7, 2023
Merged

$SU(3)$ support #43

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 7, 2023

Conversation

simone-romiti
Copy link
Collaborator

Added the support for $SU(3)$ gauge fields.
This pull request solves also this issue #38.

implementing support for SU(3) fields
implementing eq. 4.26 of Gattringer&Lang
1st version that compiles successfully. E and dH in the hmc give nan, still debugging.
- exponentiation of su(3) works. The formulas were found using sympy and I made a numerical test of the unitarity of the matrix.
- get_deriv() still implemented incorrectly
still understanding how to implement get_deriv of SU(3)
finally get acceptance rate = 1 for SU(3) run. Check the plaquette, is low in value, maybe the normalization is wrong.
@simone-romiti simone-romiti merged commit 3610ba5 into boundary_conditions Mar 7, 2023
@simone-romiti simone-romiti mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant