Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom recipe system for gas centrifuge and SILEX #1461

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

FOlkvangrField
Copy link
Contributor

Add custom recipe system for gas centrifuge and SILEX , and made some changes to the recipe processing logic and nei support for gas centrifuges. Now we can create a new gas centrifuge formula process, configure whether a certain level of PseudoFluid needs overclocking upgrade, whether additional items will be produced if there is no overclocking upgrade, whether it can idle, and whether it can idle to consume three times the amount of the next level of PseudoFluid produced by one centrifugation of PseudoFluid to output additional items. I have mostly written the specific details in the comment at the top of the JSON file. Regarding Nei support, I have written a lot of shits to ensure readability as much as possible. Simply put, it will generate a recipe for Nei to read for a certain level of PseudoFluid in a processing flow, including whether to add overclocking or idle. However, it still looks a bit rough, and I haven't found a better implementation method yet.
image

Add custom recipe system for gas centrifuge and SILEX ,and made some changes to the recipe processing logic and nei support for gas centrifuges
@FOlkvangrField
Copy link
Contributor Author

So @HbmMods , how do you think about it? I've thought about displaying the entire process of a fluid directly on one of the NEI interfaces, including branching processes with or without overclocking and idling, but then I would have to limit the number of steps in a set of processes to avoid going out of the display range

@HbmMods
Copy link
Owner

HbmMods commented May 6, 2024

I haven't had the time to review the PR yet, the gas centrifuge code is quite delicate and config PRs have a history of being broken in some way so I'd rather take my time for this one.

@FOlkvangrField
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, looking forward to your achievement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants