Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replacing incompatible GPLv2 license with GPLv3+ as contributors have agreed! #2331

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 28, 2019

Most contributors voted for GPLv3+ at #2273 before two contributors have manipulated the voting. I herein sending the new license.

The voting result is confirmed by @HelloZeroNet at #2273 (comment).

I was who reported the licensing issue and the voting is ended so I demand to merge my contribution or you legally required to remove my contributions from UiRequest.py what you also merged in your own name!

I contributed to ZeroNet and no credit is given to me and now I send again a contribution which you closed because "you want to do by yourself again" changes which based on my contribution. Either you remove all my contributions from UiRequest.py or you merge this pull request and give me credit for this and all previous contributions!

You are not allowed to copy my contributions and merge it in your name!

Swiss Confederation added 2 commits November 28, 2019 17:32
Reflecting the voting results. Most contributors voted for GPLv3+ see: #2273 (comment)
Reflecting the voting results. Most contributors voted for GPLv3+ see: #2273 (comment)
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 28, 2019

I warning you that I will distribute ZeroNet under GPLv3+ no matter what you do! I do follow the voting results which clearly indicated that most contributors want GPLv3+. Under the GPLv3 license you are not allowed to close pull request and merge it in your name! Please remove my contributions from UiRequest.py before you close these pull request again! I warning you I will sue you personally if you later replace the license in your name or if you put any other license on ZeroNet than GPLv3+!

@HelloZeroNet
Copy link
Owner

HelloZeroNet commented Nov 28, 2019

The voting majority should be based on number of active lines in the repository. I have not seen these kind of statistics, so I have not decided yet if I pick GPL3/GPL3+/MIT or any other license.

But once I do, I will update the license myself to avoid future drama.

You are feel free to do what you want all code I have written is licensed under CCZERO. I not doing this to receive any kind of fame.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 28, 2019

You don't own ZeroNet and I'm a contributor. I demand that you replace the license with GPLv3+!

@filips123
Copy link
Contributor

You don't own ZeroNet

Yes? How? And where is the problem now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants