-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Fix typos and file permissions #164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Fixed multiple typos: accommodate, separate, elaborate, privileges - Made all executable_* files executable - Made all .sh files executable - Removed backup file quickstart.yml.bak Co-authored-by: openhands <openhands@all-hands.dev>
- Added guard condition to macos.sh.tmpl to prevent execution unless APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS=true - Updated run_after_01-pre-install.sh.tmpl to set the environment variable when applying macOS settings - This prevents the sudo password prompt from appearing during normal shell initialization Co-authored-by: openhands <openhands@all-hands.dev>
- Added openhands-resolver.yml workflow to automatically resolve issues and PRs - Configured with proper permissions for contents, pull-requests, and issues - Uses configurable variables for macro, max iterations, container image, LLM model, and target branch - Includes all necessary secrets for PAT token, username, and LLM API configuration Co-authored-by: openhands <openhands@all-hands.dev>
WalkthroughThis pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the project's documentation and refining the codebase. It corrects various typos, improves file organization, introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for OpenHands issue resolution, and modifies script execution behavior in macOS settings. Changes
Uplevel your code reviews with CodeRabbit ProCodeRabbit ProIf you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, CodeRabbit Pro is free for open source projects. |
ProfessorManhattan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI stuff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Files selected (13)
- .config/docs/contributing/dev-environment.md (1)
- .config/docs/readme-playbook/managing-environments.md (1)
- .github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml (1)
- docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (2)
- docs/customization/index.md (1)
- docs/customization/scripts.md (1)
- docs/features/index.md (1)
- docs/index.md (1)
- docs/scripts/overview/profile.md (1)
- home/.chezmoiscripts/universal/run_after_01-pre-install.sh.tmpl (1)
- home/dot_config/shell/macos.sh.tmpl (1)
- home/dot_local/share/ansible/environments/prod/inventories/quickstart.yml.bak (1)
- scripts/cloudflared-ssh.sh (1)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- home/dot_local/share/ansible/environments/prod/inventories/quickstart.yml.bak (diff tokens exceeds limit)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- .config/docs/contributing/dev-environment.md
- .config/docs/readme-playbook/managing-environments.md
- docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
- docs/customization/scripts.md
- docs/features/index.md
- docs/index.md
- docs/scripts/overview/profile.md
- scripts/cloudflared-ssh.sh
Review comments generated (4)
- Review: 3
- LGTM: 1
Tips
Chat with
CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)
- Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
- Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging
@coderabbitaiin a reply.
Code suggestions
- The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
- You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.
Pausing incremental reviews
- Add
@coderabbitai: ignoreanywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.
| # Exit early if not explicitly requested to run system configuration | ||
| if [ "$APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS" != "true" ]; then | ||
| exit 0 | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addition of an early exit condition based on the APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS environment variable is a good practice. It allows users to control whether they want to apply macOS settings or not, which can be useful in different scenarios. However, it would be better to inform the user about this early exit with a log message.
if [ "$APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS" != "true" ]; then
+ echo "Skipping macOS settings application as APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS is not set to true"
exit 0
fi| macOSSettings() { | ||
| if [ -d /System ] && [ -d /Applications ] && [ -f "${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh" ]; then | ||
| bash "${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh" | ||
| APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS=true bash "${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new environment variable APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS is set to true and used directly in the bash command. However, it's not clear where this environment variable is used or checked within the script ${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh. If it's meant to be a flag to control the execution of the script, it should be properly checked inside the script. If it's not used, it might be unnecessary.
- APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS=true bash "${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh"
+ bash "${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/shell/macos.sh"Please ensure that the environment variable APPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS is actually needed and used correctly within the script.
| name: Resolve Issue with OpenHands | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| issues: | ||
| types: [labeled] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| types: [labeled] | ||
| issue_comment: | ||
| types: [created] | ||
| pull_request_review_comment: | ||
| types: [created] | ||
| pull_request_review: | ||
| types: [submitted] | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
| issues: write | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| call-openhands-resolver: | ||
| uses: All-Hands-AI/OpenHands/.github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml@main | ||
| with: | ||
| macro: ${{ vars.OPENHANDS_MACRO || '@openhands-agent' }} | ||
| max_iterations: ${{ fromJson(vars.OPENHANDS_MAX_ITER || 50) }} | ||
| base_container_image: ${{ vars.OPENHANDS_BASE_CONTAINER_IMAGE || '' }} | ||
| LLM_MODEL: ${{ vars.LLM_MODEL || 'anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514' }} | ||
| target_branch: ${{ vars.TARGET_BRANCH || 'main' }} | ||
| runner: ${{ vars.TARGET_RUNNER }} | ||
| secrets: | ||
| PAT_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} | ||
| PAT_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.PAT_USERNAME }} | ||
| LLM_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }} | ||
| LLM_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }} No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new GitHub Actions workflow file seems to be well structured and follows the standard conventions. However, there's a potential security concern with the use of secrets directly in the workflow file. It's generally recommended to avoid hardcoding secrets in your code or configuration files. Instead, consider using GitHub's encrypted secrets feature to securely store and use sensitive information.
Also, it's important to validate the inputs for this action. If any of these inputs are not provided or invalid, the action might fail unexpectedly. Consider adding input validation logic to handle such scenarios gracefully.
Lastly, there is no newline at the end of the file. While this won't cause any functional issues, it's a common convention to end files with a newline. This helps with displaying the file correctly across different tools and platforms.
name: Resolve Issue with OpenHands
on:
issues:
types: [labeled]
pull_request:
types: [labeled]
issue_comment:
types: [created]
pull_request_review_comment:
types: [created]
pull_request_review:
types: [submitted]
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
issues: write
jobs:
call-openhands-resolver:
uses: All-Hands-AI/OpenHands/.github/workflows/openhands-resolver.yml@main
with:
macro: ${{ vars.OPENHANDS_MACRO || '@openhands-agent' }}
max_iterations: ${{ fromJson(vars.OPENHANDS_MAX_ITER || 50) }}
base_container_image: ${{ vars.OPENHANDS_BASE_CONTAINER_IMAGE || '' }}
LLM_MODEL: ${{ vars.LLM_MODEL || 'anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514' }}
target_branch: ${{ vars.TARGET_BRANCH || 'main' }}
runner: ${{ vars.TARGET_RUNNER }}
secrets:
PAT_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }}
PAT_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.PAT_USERNAME }}
LLM_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
LLM_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+35: \n
Co-authored-by: openhands openhands@all-hands.dev- What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Other information:
Summary by CodeRabbit
macOSSettingsfunction, controlled by a new environment variableAPPLY_MACOS_SETTINGS. This allows users to opt out of applying macOS settings during script execution.