Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove outer_depos_loop #1101

Merged

Conversation

AlexanderSinn
Copy link
Member

Since we now have particle sorting, outer_depos_loop is not necessary anymore. It couldn't work with Explicit deposition because the shape factor could have a different size. As a replacement for the CI test, I added a CPU version for plasmas.reorder_period that uses SortParticlesByCell from amrex.

  • Small enough (< few 100s of lines), otherwise it should probably be split into smaller PRs
  • Tested (describe the tests in the PR description)
  • Runs on GPU (basic: the code compiles and run well with the new module)
  • Contains an automated test (checksum and/or comparison with theory)
  • Documented: all elements (classes and their members, functions, namespaces, etc.) are documented
  • Constified (All that can be const is const)
  • Code is clean (no unwanted comments, )
  • Style and code conventions are respected at the bottom of https://github.com/Hi-PACE/hipace
  • Proper label and GitHub project, if applicable

@AlexanderSinn AlexanderSinn added the cleaning Code cleaning, avoid duplication, better naming, better style etc. label Apr 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MaxThevenet MaxThevenet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the cleaning!

@MaxThevenet MaxThevenet merged commit 6fd16cd into Hi-PACE:development May 2, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleaning Code cleaning, avoid duplication, better naming, better style etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants