Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

osrm-backend: use tbb for HEAD build #110153

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cho-m
Copy link
Member

@cho-m cho-m commented Sep 9, 2022

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

Upstream PR for tbb support: Project-OSRM/osrm-backend#6300

Didn't try, but seemed unlikely to easily backport patch given last release was 1 year ago.

@cho-m cho-m added the CI-no-bottles Merge without publishing bottles label Sep 9, 2022
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot added boost Boost use is a significant feature of the PR or issue lua Lua use is a significant feature of the PR or issue labels Sep 9, 2022
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Member

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.

@cho-m cho-m deleted the osrm-backend-head branch September 13, 2022 05:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
boost Boost use is a significant feature of the PR or issue CI-no-bottles Merge without publishing bottles lua Lua use is a significant feature of the PR or issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants