Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update qt5 urls #4905

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Update qt5 urls #4905

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ts826848
Copy link
Contributor

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally prior to submission with brew install <formula> (where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting)?
  • Does your submission pass brew audit --new-formula <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

This is probably slightly premature...

At the very least I think the HEAD URL should be changed. Doesn't make sense for stable to be ahead of HEAD.

Also remove patches fixing build error due to missing QtBase widget
example targets. This has been fixed upstream, but not in the current
stable release (5.6.1)
@alvarolorentedev
Copy link

even if repo is different the formulae fails to install with same problem as current branch on os x sierra

@ts826848
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah... In any case, it seems that only the change to HEAD should be applied; stable shouldn't be changed until 5.7.1

@ts826848 ts826848 closed this Sep 27, 2016
@DomT4
Copy link
Member

DomT4 commented Sep 28, 2016

Working on Qt5. It's being "fun". I'll take a fresh run at it later today, my CPU must think I hate it lately.

@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants