Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zg/update evi ts example #73

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

Zg/update evi ts example #73

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

zgreathouse
Copy link
Member

Summary

  • Updates the (no framework) EVI Typescript Example project to use the latest version of the Hume TS SDK (0.8.1) and refactors the code to utilize the breaking changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@norman-codes norman-codes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great and functions well!

2 points for consideration prior to approval:

  1. the latest version of the TypeScript SDK is now 0.8.3, whereas this example uses 0.8.1. It works with 0.8.3, and so the package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml may be updated and regenerated respectively
  2. Users may benefit from the VITE_HUME_CONFIG_ID being mentioned in the README, since it is a new environment variable, with a statement clarifying that the acceptable values include an empty string, or a valid EVI config id - and not the default value of "YOUR_CONFIG_ID"

Copy link
Contributor

@norman-codes norman-codes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! Thanks for addressing the comments. 💯

@zgreathouse zgreathouse merged commit c8c870b into main Jul 18, 2024
1 check passed
@zgreathouse zgreathouse deleted the zg/update-evi-ts-example branch July 18, 2024 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants