You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have problems in formula derivation. Very disturbing! Thank you very much!
In Section II. B, the authors state “Note that, due to the relaxation variable \omega, enforcing multiple DCBF constraints for each hi is equivalent to enforcing a single DCBF constraint.” I am confused about this issue. Why the relaxation variable \omega leads to this case? Is the statement not true without the relaxation variable \omega?
In Section III. C, the authors state “Additionally, we can introduce the relaxation
variables without affecting the analysis in this section.” Why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have problems in formula derivation. Very disturbing! Thank you very much!
In Section II. B, the authors state “Note that, due to the relaxation variable \omega, enforcing multiple DCBF constraints for each hi is equivalent to enforcing a single DCBF constraint.” I am confused about this issue. Why the relaxation variable \omega leads to this case? Is the statement not true without the relaxation variable \omega?
In Section III. C, the authors state “Additionally, we can introduce the relaxation
variables without affecting the analysis in this section.” Why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: