Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for gathering proc files necessary to convert coredump to minidump #157

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

swermin
Copy link
Contributor

@swermin swermin commented Apr 1, 2024

Running breakpads core2md out-of-process requires some files from the /proc/$pid folder to be able to successfully generate enough information.
This change enables gathering of those said files to be able to support that flow. It is hidden behind a feature flag and its disabled by default so that the behavior of the composer is same as before.

This feature is ment to grab the minimum files needed to be able to generate minidumps. So heap data will be omitted and such.

swermin added 5 commits April 1, 2024 17:56
Signed-off-by: Ermin Hrkalovic <ermin.hrkalovic@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Ermin Hrkalovic <ermin.hrkalovic@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Ermin Hrkalovic <ermin.hrkalovic@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Ermin Hrkalovic <ermin.hrkalovic@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Ermin Hrkalovic <ermin.hrkalovic@outlook.com>
@swermin swermin force-pushed the feat/include-proc-info branch from 849d539 to 5c6f2a0 Compare April 1, 2024 15:57
@No9
Copy link
Collaborator

No9 commented May 2, 2024

@swermin quick update to let you know I'll get to the review over the next few days.
I want to land this for the next release which I'm planning for the 9th.

@swermin
Copy link
Contributor Author

swermin commented May 2, 2024

Sounds great, I am available anytime to answer and makes changes as needed!

@usimd
Copy link
Contributor

usimd commented May 23, 2024

Hey @No9! Not meaning to pressure, just kindly wanted to ask if it would be possible to proceed here in order to get a new release (eagerly waiting for #160 😛)

@No9
Copy link
Collaborator

No9 commented May 23, 2024

Thanks for the nudge @usimd
I'm external to IBM now so I've just requested @jjasghar to set me up with the right permissions to accept this.
FWIW this is close to a LGTM but I want to test it before release.

@No9
Copy link
Collaborator

No9 commented May 25, 2024

Update - Looks like I'm back as repo admin - Thanks @jjasghar
I'll look at this ASAP.

@swermin
Copy link
Contributor Author

swermin commented Jul 14, 2024

Hi @No9, have you had a chance to go through these changes? 😄

@No9 No9 merged commit 64eb2df into IBM:main Aug 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@No9
Copy link
Collaborator

No9 commented Aug 8, 2024

Thanks for the reminder - been very busy for the past few weeks.
I'll wait to see if we can get this other one in and do a release.
#162 (review)

@swermin swermin deleted the feat/include-proc-info branch August 13, 2024 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants