Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correct WithCustomFallbackPartitioner implementation #1988

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2021

Conversation

LubergAlexander
Copy link
Contributor

@LubergAlexander LubergAlexander commented Jul 16, 2021

WithCustomFallbackPartitioner implementation was broken and didn't allow passing a partitioner

Fixes #1913

@ghost ghost added the cla-needed label Jul 16, 2021
@dnwe dnwe changed the title Fixed WithCustomFallbackPartitioner implementation. Fixes #1913 fix: correct WithCustomFallbackPartitioner implementation Aug 9, 2021
@dnwe
Copy link
Collaborator

dnwe commented Aug 9, 2021

@LubergAlexander thanks, the fix looks good, please can you sign the CLA?

@LubergAlexander
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dnwe - done! However I am not sure how to trigger this check again, I suppose it will refresh.

@ghost ghost removed the cla-needed label Aug 9, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@dnwe dnwe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM

@dnwe dnwe merged commit 092353f into IBM:master Aug 9, 2021
@LubergAlexander LubergAlexander deleted the fix_1913 branch August 9, 2021 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Syntax Error when using option WithCustomFallbackPartitioner in NewCustomPartitioner
2 participants