Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update auth rules #63

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

WadeBarnes
Copy link
Contributor

  • Update reference links to CANdy Network Provisional Governance Framework (Layer 1) document.
  • Update permissions for adding a NETWORK_MONITOR DID

Signed-off-by: Wade Barnes <wade@neoterictech.ca>
- Align the permissions to the updated CANdy Network Provisional Governance Framework (Layer 1) document.

Signed-off-by: Wade Barnes <wade@neoterictech.ca>
@SylvainMartel
Copy link
Collaborator

@WadeBarnes I see the links now point to the Groupes-de-travail-CANdy-Working-Groups repo, but does the fact that it's a private repo cause problem?

@WadeBarnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@WadeBarnes I see the links now point to the Groupes-de-travail-CANdy-Working-Groups repo, but does the fact that it's a private repo cause problem?

Great question @SylvainMartel. @PhilippeBourque, @CharlesMacpherson, @krobinsonca, Would you be able to weigh in on the fact that the draft governance documents are now restricted access? Is the plan to open it back up at some point?

@CharlesMacpherson
Copy link

@WadeBarnes I see the links now point to the Groupes-de-travail-CANdy-Working-Groups repo, but does the fact that it's a private repo cause problem?

Great question @SylvainMartel. @PhilippeBourque, @CharlesMacpherson, @krobinsonca, Would you be able to weigh in on the fact that the draft governance documents are now restricted access? Is the plan to open it back up at some point?

I'd say that right now, it is private because we are still working through the agreement between the parties. After that is signed in the Fall, likely there will be an announcement. At that point it could be make public, but in a specific new public facing repo. The working group one will be remain private and when changes are made public, moved to the public repo.

@WadeBarnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good. So we'll keep the reference links pointing to the private repo for now since that is the only reference. We'll update to the public references when they become available.

@WadeBarnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

The updated rules have been written to the ledgers.

Copy link

@CharlesMacpherson CharlesMacpherson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SylvainMartel SylvainMartel merged commit 98dc660 into ICCS-ISAC:main May 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants