Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IGVF-1686-software-version-req #933

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

jenjou
Copy link
Contributor

@jenjou jenjou commented Jun 3, 2024

No description provided.

@jenjou jenjou force-pushed the IGVF-1686-software-version-req branch from 84ec9e7 to 2b51970 Compare June 4, 2024 18:56
@gabdank gabdank force-pushed the IGVF-1686-software-version-req branch from 2b51970 to 3e59961 Compare June 4, 2024 23:32
Copy link
Contributor

@gabdank gabdank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add changelog

@jenjou jenjou force-pushed the IGVF-1686-software-version-req branch from 3e59961 to 9407b63 Compare June 5, 2024 16:54
@gabdank gabdank force-pushed the IGVF-1686-software-version-req branch from 9407b63 to 48981ec Compare June 7, 2024 16:17
merged_note = ' '.join([x for x in [software_note, version_note, lab_note, award_note] if x != ''])
notes = value.get('notes', '')
notes += merged_note
value['notes'] = notes.strip()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if for unknown to me reason the notes remain empty your upgrade is going to cause validation error, since you are assigning '' value to notes and that is invalid

@jenjou jenjou force-pushed the IGVF-1686-software-version-req branch from 48981ec to 47e5cf3 Compare June 7, 2024 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants