Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Distinguish between TypeParam declaration (types, methods) and TypeParamRefs #606

Closed
leventov opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Distinguish between TypeParam declaration (types, methods) and TypeParamRefs #606

leventov opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@leventov
Copy link
Contributor

With ability to search by refs like getDeclaration().

Currently code analysis and manipulation capabilities are limited because it's impossible to detect type parameter shadowing.
@GerardPaligot GerardPaligot mentioned this issue May 9, 2016
Closed
@monperrus
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree. This would be regular with the method parameter modeling. Interestingly, I guess this was partially the case in the past because we recently removed CtTypeParameter. I propose to reintroduce it named CtFormalTypeParameter (to make it more explicit).

@GerardPaligot GerardPaligot mentioned this issue Aug 23, 2016
Merged
monperrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2016
@GerardPaligot @monperrus
feat(ast): Introduces new metamodel class CtTypeParameter for represe…
25f9202 
…nting a generic type parameter. (Closes #606)
@tdurieux tdurieux mentioned this issue Sep 19, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@leventov @monperrus