-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
put comments as ctstatement only if -j flag is present #666
Comments
I don't think it is a good idea to use the |
monperrus
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2016
Restores backward compatibility. Closes #666
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Discussion for @arnobl use case
Proposal: widen the scope of -j flag as follows:
put comments as ctstatement only if -j flag is present
and update the documentation of the -j flag:
-j consider documentation:
this flags enables the documentation handling: adds statement comments in the model, rewrite comments on pretty-printing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: