Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There should be a way to shift the window in the time domain in hierarchy mode #300

Open
FredrikKarlssonSpeech opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@FredrikKarlssonSpeech
Copy link

In analyses of spontaneous speech samples or annotations with a very high number of marks per second (like maximum performance tasks), the hierarchy view becomes cumbersome. You can zoom in to the view to make it more manageable (a feature that may be also highlighted more clearly in the documentation), but then you need to zoom out again to 100% to move to a portion that belongs to a different portion of the sound recording.

Transcription work becomes cumbersome this way and I think that an ability to the time window also in this view would be very helpful.

@MJochim
Copy link
Contributor

MJochim commented Aug 17, 2021

Thank you for the input, Fredrik. We have hit issue #300 – what a milestone. A more unfortunate milestone, however, is that @raphywink has left the IPS and the EMU-SDMS is currently out of funding.

We at the IPS will do what we can to fix bugs, security issues or necessary adjustments to new versions of R; but we cannot currently work on new features or performance improvements.

I think your suggestion makes sense, though. If anyone were to contribute a pull request, I’d be happy to review and merge it.

@samgregory
Copy link
Contributor

HI @FredrikKarlssonSpeech - I know that this proposal is related to #301 which I've just responded to. As per @MJochim's suggestion I've made an attempt at this feature... no pull request yet as I'd like some feedback.

Can you explain what you picture the time window being like in the hierarchy view?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants