Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize so labels don't have to be stored in a Tuple #19

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title Generalize so labels don't have to be Tuple Generalize so labels don't have to be stored in a Tuple Jan 16, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 4453f64 into main Jan 16, 2025
10 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the generalize_labels branch January 16, 2025 23:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.66%. Comparing base (11f8157) to head (55a347a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/BaseExtensions/indexin.jl 25.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #19   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.66%   91.66%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         360      360           
=======================================
  Hits          330      330           
  Misses         30       30           
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant