Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support stateless code flow on the oidc-frontend #399

Merged

Conversation

smalihaider
Copy link

@smalihaider smalihaider commented Dec 22, 2021

Depends on IdentityPython/pyop#41

All Submissions:

  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you added an explanation of what problem you are trying to solve with this PR?
  • Have you added information on what your changes do and why you chose this as your solution?
  • Have you written new tests for your changes?
  • Does your submission pass tests?
  • This project follows PEP8 style guide. Have you run your code against the 'flake8' linter?

@smalihaider smalihaider changed the title WIP: Changes against the new stateless code flow in pyop. Changes against the new stateless code flow in pyop. Feb 9, 2022
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kanakarakis <ivan.kanak@gmail.com>
@c00kiemon5ter c00kiemon5ter changed the title Changes against the new stateless code flow in pyop. Support stateless code flow on the oidc-frontend Apr 18, 2022
@c00kiemon5ter c00kiemon5ter added the next-release should become part of the next release label May 3, 2022
@c00kiemon5ter c00kiemon5ter force-pushed the stateless-code-flow branch from 7bf5302 to b903d97 Compare May 6, 2022 14:02
@c00kiemon5ter c00kiemon5ter changed the title Support stateless code flow on the oidc-frontend Support stateless code flow on the oidc-frontend May 6, 2022
@c00kiemon5ter c00kiemon5ter merged commit 5da6bfa into IdentityPython:master May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
next-release should become part of the next release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants