Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/implementing anoncreds revocation methods in main (aka replicating acapy revocation repo flow in AME) #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Feature/implementing anoncreds revocation methods in main (aka replicating acapy revocation repo flow in AME) #12

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

anwalker293
Copy link
Contributor

Implementing anoncreds revocation methods in main!!/replication acapy revocation repo flow in AME

(I did check this, but I would recommend printing out that the presentations are what you would like/if this is all of the information that you would like out of the summary method :))

Signed-off-by: Alexandra Walker ☀

…atus :D)

Signed-off-by: Alexandra N. Walker <alex.walker@indicio.tech>
@dbluhm dbluhm changed the base branch from main to feature/revocation October 18, 2022 18:00
Copy link
Member

@dbluhm dbluhm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! My only requested change is that you format the whole file with black and then we can get this merged.

Signed-off-by: Alexandra N. Walker <alex.walker@indicio.tech>
Copy link
Member

@dbluhm dbluhm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

@dbluhm dbluhm merged commit c474172 into Indicio-tech:feature/revocation Oct 18, 2022
@anwalker293 anwalker293 deleted the feature/implementing-anoncreds-revocation-methods-in-main branch November 16, 2022 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants