Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in uniquify.go, eip712_cosmos.go, typed_data.go, and chain.go #282

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Pronoss
Copy link

@Pronoss Pronoss commented Jan 29, 2025

  1. chain.go:

    • Fixed messagessmessages in an error log.
  2. eip712_cosmos.go & typed_data.go:

    • Corrected defereddeferred in comments.
  3. uniquify.go:

    • Fixed MultilpeMultiple and sequentallysequentially in a function description.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected log message pluralization in chain client
    • Fixed typographical errors in documentation comments
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced EIP712 transaction data wrapping with new WrapTxToEIP712V2 function
    • Improved error reporting and serialization approach for transaction handling

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses minor improvements across several files in the codebase, focusing on documentation clarity, logging precision, and a new transaction wrapping method. The changes include a log message correction in the chain client, a new EIP712 transaction wrapping function, a documentation typo fix in a uniquify utility, and a minor comment update in a typed data module. These modifications aim to enhance code readability and provide an alternative method for EIP712 transaction handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
client/chain/chain.go Fixed log message pluralization from "messagess" to "messages" in BroadcastMsg method
eip712_cosmos.go Added new WrapTxToEIP712V2 function for alternative Cosmos transaction EIP712 wrapping
ethereum/util/uniquify.go Corrected documentation typos in Call method comment
typeddata/typed_data.go Minor comment correction from "defered" to "deferred"

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant ChainClient
    participant EIP712Wrapper
    
    Client->>ChainClient: BroadcastMsg
    ChainClient-->>Client: Improved Error Logging
    
    Client->>EIP712Wrapper: WrapTxToEIP712V2
    EIP712Wrapper-->>Client: Wrapped Transaction Data
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's code review delight,
Typos fixed with precision's might,
Messages clear, logs shining bright,
EIP712 dancing in the light,
Refactoring with pure code insight! 🔍

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
eip712_cosmos.go (1)

478-478: Consider a narrower lint ignore scope.
By disabling all gocritic checks for this line, you might inadvertently overlook useful warnings or suggested improvements. If you only mean to suppress a specific gocritic check, adjusting the directive to target that check would be more precise and safer.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9ea79e and db07e0c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • client/chain/chain.go (1 hunks)
  • eip712_cosmos.go (1 hunks)
  • ethereum/util/uniquify.go (1 hunks)
  • typeddata/typed_data.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • ethereum/util/uniquify.go
  • typeddata/typed_data.go
  • client/chain/chain.go

Copy link
Collaborator

@aarmoa aarmoa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the reason for submitting a PR without any functional change in it

@aarmoa
Copy link
Collaborator

aarmoa commented Jan 29, 2025

We don't accept PR just changing comments pointing to the master branch

@aarmoa aarmoa closed this Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants