-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: Missing writing of the nifti descrip field. #4810
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Hi @dzenanz, please rerun the failed test if needed (it isn't related to this change) and merge when it passes. Thanks. |
This will need to be rebased on top of #4811, after it gets merged. I plan to merge that as soon as its CI finished. |
@dzenanz I did a quick search and didn't find it. But for patches for 5.4 what is the order of merging for master, release, releaes-5.4? |
I think merge into most specific first. So first merge topic branch into |
#4811 has now been merged. A plain rebase should be sufficient for a green CI. |
The nifti descrip field is currently only read and exposed via the ITK_FileNotes metadata dictionary variable. Setting the ITK_FileNotes via the metadata dictionary has no effect while writing. This commit writes the contents of the ITK_FileNotes variable if it is found in the metadata dictionary.
Rebased and force pushed. |
I merged it to |
Thanks. Much appreciated. |
The nifti descrip field is currently only read and exposed via the ITK_FileNotes metadata dictionary variable. Setting the ITK_FileNotes via the metadata dictionary has no effect while writing. This commit writes the contents of the ITK_FileNotes variable if it is found in the metadata dictionary.