Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reuse dpctl.tensort.take for dpnp.take #1492

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023
Merged

Reuse dpctl.tensort.take for dpnp.take #1492

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023

Conversation

vlad-perevezentsev
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR modifies dpnp.take() implementation to use dpctl.tensor.take() instead of dpnp implementation.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Show resolved Hide resolved
dpnp/dpnp_iface_indexing.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@antonwolfy antonwolfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great! thank you @vlad-perevezentsev

@antonwolfy antonwolfy merged commit 689831a into master Jul 28, 2023
@antonwolfy antonwolfy deleted the reuse_take branch July 28, 2023 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants