Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove test_cond_nan_input from TestCond #2221

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

vlad-perevezentsev
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR suggests removing test_cond_input_nan due to undefined behavior for different backend in different versions of OpenBLAS and OneMKL to avoid possible future falls

Checking all input for nan's is expensive, so MKL lapack functions don't do it

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

@antonwolfy antonwolfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vlad-perevezentsev vlad-perevezentsev merged commit 48babd0 into master Dec 10, 2024
47 of 48 checks passed
@vlad-perevezentsev vlad-perevezentsev deleted the update_cond_tests branch December 10, 2024 12:51
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
This PR suggests removing `test_cond_input_nan` due to undefined
behavior for different backend in different versions of OpenBLAS and
OneMKL to avoid possible future falls

_Checking all input for nan's is expensive, so MKL lapack functions
don't do it_ 48babd0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants