First, you need to build the version of libs3 included in this repo. To do so:
just cd libs3
and make
and make install
. Then compile the project in
code
: cd code; make
The libs3
in the repo is the latest from upstream, but with a patched openssl
config so it doesn't use deprecated openssl 3.0 functions.
The latest version in ubuntu repos does not incorporate some upstream changes to the API so we can't really use that easily.
In project directory, set s3 credentials in s3.config, then run:
./objfs-mount -d <s3_bucket>/<s3_prefix> <local_mount_dir>
The bucket MUST have an item called <prefix>.00000000
(8 zeroes). This file is
generated with the mkfs.py
script. Call it with python mkfs.py <prefix>
,
then upload the resulting file to the bucket.
snap install minio
systemctl start minio
Navigate to hostname:9001
, then:
- Create a bucket
obfs-test
- Make it public (for testing permission's dont matter)
- Generate a secret / access key pair
- Run
python3 mkfs.py prefix0
- Upload the resulting file to the bucket
- Put credentials into
s3.config
- Run the mount executable as usual
./objfs-mount -d obfs-test/prefix0 /mnt/obfs-test
To compile filebench:
apt install autoconf bison flex
git clone git@github.com:filebench/filebench.git
cd filebench
libtoolize
aclocal
autoheader
automake --add-missing
autoupdate
autoconf
./configure
make
Executable at ./filebench
. The modified workloads are in measure/
, to run
them use filebench -f measure/workload-webserver.f
or whatever workload you
choose to run.
data structures should be locked so that we can handle multiple threads - I think that will help perforance
We need to implement checkpointing per the description in the paper and in union-mount.md
see write-coalescing.md
Maybe. I think it's more important to get union mount working.
See union-mount.md
I'm not sure whether or not we should port this to use the FUSE low-level interface. Note that this would mess up using the CS5600 tests.
I should commit those to the repo. They run directly against the high-level FUSE methods, single-threaded. It's not a stress test, but it tests a lot of cases of different block sizes for reads and writes.
We might be able to use https://github.com/pjd/pjdfstest it runs OK with ext4.
I haven't looked too thoroughly, but I think it's more of a standards conformance test than a stress test, although it still could be useful
This is probably much more comprehensive. It's definitely bigger (125K LOC vs 20K)
It would take a bit of shell scripting to pass object prefixes instead of partition names, but I don't think it would be a huge deal
Not sure if this would be helpful, or how much work it would be to use it: https://github.com/google/file-system-stress-testing
hard links - any tests relying on them are going to fail. I think adding *them is fairly trivial - we've got inodes, we just have to add a reference *count to file objects.
fsync/fsyncdir - I don't know if we need to do anything more with them
holes - I'm not sure if we support holes properly, or if we need to.