Sprint 002 issue 150 reup

[br2490]

Clean pull request.
Continues work on #150 after resolving issues with Windows Vagrants...

Also note that the PSR2 thingy I use removed, which it probably shouldn't have.
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;

@ruebot @whikloj @DiegoPino This PR is better than my last.

[ruebot]

@br2490 does this supersede #206?

[br2490]

Yes.

Sent from my phone. Forgive brevity and autocorrect.
On Apr 26, 2016 6:57 PM, "Nick Ruest" notifications@github.com wrote:

@br2490 https://github.com/br2490 does this supersede #206
#206?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#210 (comment)

[ruebot]

@whikloj @DiegoPino should we review this and #169, and get them merged before we split everything apart?

[whikloj]

I'll test this, but I think the issue was when @DiegoPino and I spoke about this. We figured this should probably go into the (yet to be created) PcdmObjectService. That way we leave the core delete functionality alone.

If it works, I'll see if I can move it via a PR on @br2490's PR.

[whikloj]

Actually, there is no way to commit this to a new file without losing the contributions. So I'll test it tomorrow and if it works, we can merge it and then create a new task to create the PcdmObjectService and move this delete functionality there instead of leaving it here.

But @br2490, it looks like you have merge conflicts. Can you rebase this on origin/sprint-002?

[br2490]

@whikloj assuming I've managed the merge + Travis likes my code compliance, I think we're okay.

[br2490]

Dear Travis,

It has come to my attention you're aware that I lint files like I clean my lint trap; infrequently and poorly.
Please accept my current commit as recompense for my haphazardness.

Best,
Ben - still totally on vacation.

[ruebot]

@br2490 you can blame me for getting coding standards setup! ...and you can enjoy your vacation, and have me get it up to standards if you want. I can do a pull against your pull if it fails again.

[br2490]

@ruebot I've got this, it's just two lines that are too long. ;)