Skip to content

Conversation

@IvanVergiliev
Copy link
Owner

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)

How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

@IvanVergiliev IvanVergiliev merged this pull request into optimize-orc-filters May 27, 2019
IvanVergiliev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix the error caused by interval output in ExtractBenchmark
### Why are the changes needed?

fix a bug in the test

```scala
[info]   Running case: cast to interval
[error] Exception in thread "main" org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot use interval type in the table schema.;;
[error] OverwriteByExpression RelationV2[] noop-table, true, true
[error] +- Project [(subtractdates(cast(cast(id#0L as timestamp) as date), -719162) + subtracttimestamps(cast(id#0L as timestamp), -30610249419876544)) AS ((CAST(CAST(id AS TIMESTAMP) AS DATE) - DATE '0001-01-01') + (CAST(id AS TIMESTAMP) - TIMESTAMP '1000-01-01 01:02:03.123456'))#2]
[error]    +- Range (1262304000, 1272304000, step=1, splits=Some(1))
[error]
[error] 	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.TypeUtils$.failWithIntervalType(TypeUtils.scala:106)
[error] 	at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$25(CheckAnalysis.scala:389)
[error] 	at org.a
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

no

### How was this patch tested?

re-run benchmark

Closes apache#27867 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31111.

Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants