Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert CiteSeerX fetcher to new infrastructure #4185

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 13, 2018
Merged

Conversation

tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

The old implementation first extracted the detail pages for each article matched by the query and then went to every detail page to extract the bibliographic information. Instead, we now parse the COinS information that is already contained in the main result page and thereby reduce the number of requests to 1 per query.

With this PR, now all fetcher are converted to the new infrastructure and the old one can now be removed (to be done in a new PR).


  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described
  • Tests created for changes
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for bigger UI changes)
  • Ensured that the git commit message is a good one
  • Check documentation status (Issue created for outdated help page at help.jabref.org?)

The old implementation first extracted the detail pages for each article matched by the query and then went to every detail page to extract the bibliographic information. Instead, we now parse the COinS information that is already contained in the main result page and thereby reduce the number of requests to 1 per query.
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez added the status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Jul 8, 2018
expected.setType(BibtexEntryTypes.MISC);
expected.setField("author", "Wang Wei and Zhang Pingwen and Zhang Zhifei");
expected.setField("title", "Rigorous Derivation from Landau-de Gennes Theory to Eericksen-leslie Theory");
expected.setField("doi", "10.1.1.744.5780");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need test for all other parsed fields as well!

  • JOURNAL
  • YEAR
  • VOLUME
  • PAGES
  • ISSUE

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was not able to find an entry that had pages/volume or issue information. However, I added a test covering journal and year.

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez merged commit 8a36152 into master Jul 13, 2018
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez deleted the convertCiteSeer branch July 13, 2018 09:19
Siedlerchr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2018
* upstream/master: (47 commits)
  Make attached files relative to the file directory (#4212)
  execute set visible in swing thread to avoid blocking
  Fix isbn chimbori test (#4234)
  Rewrite web search pane in JavaFX (#4203)
  Update dependencies (#4231)
  Update to latest release of richtextfx (#4213)
  Fix fetcher tests (#4216)
  single line text fields (#4138)
  Make it easier to rename and move files (#4200)
  Fix that swing dialogs are hidden behind main window (#4205)
  Fixed: #4166 add move & rename file (#4217)
  update gradle plugins and gradlen to 4.9
  Update dependencies
  Remove unnecessary look and feel migration (#4204)
  Revert threading fix since this sometimes lead to freezes...
  Update year
  Fix a few more threading exceptions
  Refactor
  Convert CiteSeerX fetcher to new infrastructure (#4185)
  Make global font size customizable (#4178)
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	src/main/java/org/jabref/gui/BasePanel.java
#	src/main/java/org/jabref/gui/JabRefFrame.java
#	src/main/java/org/jabref/gui/mergeentries/MergeEntries.java
#	src/main/resources/l10n/JabRef_en.properties
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants