Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSP Inputs #1221

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 25, 2019
Merged

SSP Inputs #1221

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 25, 2019

Conversation

bmaclach
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates the SSP inputs to match manual. The constraints for many of the inputs are left blank for now because we can't express them with Drasil's current Constraint possibilities (see #1220).

Copy link
Collaborator

@smiths smiths left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bmaclach, the changes to stable look fine to me, but I don't like the implication that we are losing information. I agree that Drasil cannot currently support all of the constraints that we have in the manual version, but I don't like the idea of leaving sections blank. This implies that we are going to lose information. Can you include the constraint information in the notes field, so that we don't lose it. As Drasil matures we can move it out of notes into the proper representation.

@bmaclach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@smiths I added all of the constraints to the Notes field of the critical slip surface identification IM. I also added some FIXMEs to remind us to replace that with actual constraints once that is possible.

@smiths
Copy link
Collaborator

smiths commented Apr 24, 2019

Sounds good.

@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette merged commit d454d4e into master Apr 25, 2019
@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette deleted the sspDataCons branch April 25, 2019 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants