Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jans-config-api): swagger spec change to expose user inum at root level of response #1483

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

pujavs
Copy link
Contributor

@pujavs pujavs commented May 31, 2022

@yuriyz request you to please review and approve swagger spec change to expose inum in root level of response
Related issue #1348

@pujavs pujavs requested a review from yuriyz as a code owner May 31, 2022 15:49
@mo-auto mo-auto added comp-jans-config-api Component affected by issue or PR kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request labels May 31, 2022
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 31, 2022

[jans-config-api-parent] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 31, 2022

[jans-linux-setup] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@yuriyz yuriyz merged commit c202705 into main May 31, 2022
@yuriyz yuriyz deleted the jans-config-api-1348 branch May 31, 2022 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-jans-config-api Component affected by issue or PR kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants