Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jans-auth-server): split validation logic to TokenRestWebServiceValidator #1591 #1816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

yuriyzz
Copy link
Contributor

@yuriyzz yuriyzz commented Jul 18, 2022

Prepare


Description

feat(jans-auth-server): split validation logic to TokenRestWebServiceValidator

Part of bigger Token Endpoint refactoring.

Target issue

#1591


Test and Document the changes

  • Static code analysis has been run locally and issues have been fixed
  • Relevant unit and integration tests have been added/updated
  • [-] Relevant documentation has been updated if any (i.e. user guides, installation and configuration guides, technical design docs etc)

@yuriyz yuriyz merged commit 8f83e3a into main Jul 18, 2022
@yuriyz yuriyz deleted the jans-auth-server-1591-2 branch July 18, 2022 11:26
@mo-auto mo-auto added comp-jans-auth-server Component affected by issue or PR kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request labels Jul 18, 2022
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[jans-cli] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[agama parent] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[jans-linux-setup] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[jans-core] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[jans-config-api-parent] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[SCIM API] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[Jans authentication server parent] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-jans-auth-server Component affected by issue or PR kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants