Fix incoming RabbitMQ messages persisting to wrong store with [MartenStore]#2168
Merged
jeremydmiller merged 1 commit intomainfrom Feb 12, 2026
Merged
Fix incoming RabbitMQ messages persisting to wrong store with [MartenStore]#2168jeremydmiller merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jeremydmiller merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…Store] (#2155) When using ancillary Marten stores via [MartenStore], FlushOutgoingMessagesOnCommit was trying to mark incoming envelopes as handled in the ancillary store's table, but DurableReceiver had persisted them in the main store. Skip the in-transaction mark-as-handled when the stores differ and let DurableReceiver handle it normally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Feb 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
[MartenStore], incoming RabbitMQ envelopes were persisted in the main store byDurableReceiver, butFlushOutgoingMessagesOnCommitattempted to mark them as handled in the ancillary store's table — causing the UPDATE to affect 0 rows and leaving envelopes permanently stuck inIncomingstatus.Role == Ancillary).DurableReceiverthen handles it normally via the main store.Wolverine.RabbitMQ.Teststhat reproduces the exact scenario.Closes #2155
Test plan
Bug_2155_ancillary_store_inbox_persistencepasses with fix, fails without itWolverine.RabbitMQ.Testssuite passes (317/322, 5 pre-existing flaky failures unrelated to this change)🤖 Generated with Claude Code