VIM-855 Fix regexp character class bugs #59
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously strchr and istrchr didn't consider NUL chars as end-of-string terminators. This caused problems in regexps using character classes: a regexp like "[^a]bc" would be effectively treated as "[^abc]bc" - i.e. some literal characters from the rest of the pattern would accidentally be included in the character class.
|
Would this issue affect negative zero-width lookbehind operators too? I'm getting a similar issue with: where it matches |
|
It's most likely a different issue. |
|
Second issue tracked in VIM-856. |
|
@dezgeg Thanks for your pull request! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/VIM-855
Previously strchr and istrchr didn't consider NUL chars as end-of-string
terminators. This caused problems in regexps using character classes:
a regexp like "[^a]bc" would be effectively treated as "[^abc]bc" - i.e.
some literal characters from the rest of the pattern would accidentally be
included in the character class.